<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A full path url, bit.ly url or tinyurl &#8211; Which is best?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.englishqed.com/blog/2009/04/a-full-path-url-bitly-url-or-tinyurl-which-is-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.englishqed.com/blog/2009/04/a-full-path-url-bitly-url-or-tinyurl-which-is-best/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-full-path-url-bitly-url-or-tinyurl-which-is-best</link>
	<description>Welcome to the EnglishQED.com Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://www.englishqed.com/blog/2009/04/a-full-path-url-bitly-url-or-tinyurl-which-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishqed.com/blog/?p=46#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I think that the full path url (www.englishqed.com/blog/) is the one all first-time internet users and learners would probably consider as a &quot;trusty reference&quot;. Actually, if you have been told the *name* of a site (e.g. by friends or other information channels, referring to sth in the web about english language sounding like &#039;englishqed&#039;), you would probably feel surer when linking to a path in which you can *identify* the name you heard about. Shortened forms are very useful, but less (human)user-friendly.
Hope I&#039;ve been helpful!
See you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the full path url (www.englishqed.com/blog/) is the one all first-time internet users and learners would probably consider as a &#8220;trusty reference&#8221;. Actually, if you have been told the *name* of a site (e.g. by friends or other information channels, referring to sth in the web about english language sounding like &#8216;englishqed&#8217;), you would probably feel surer when linking to a path in which you can *identify* the name you heard about. Shortened forms are very useful, but less (human)user-friendly.<br />
Hope I&#8217;ve been helpful!<br />
See you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

